Posted by workingvis
First, a disclaimer. This is not a post about the actual issues this article raises; just about the presentation of those claims. The image from the article has appeared in numerous places and been referenced by a number of news sources, as well as appearing in my Facebook and twitter feeds.
And it’s a bad image.
One minor issue is that it is hard to work out which circle relates to which disease, as the name of the disease only appears on the legend, so you are constantly moving your eyes from grey dot on left to the legend, to the grey dot on the right. Hard to make much sense. The fact that the legend doesn’t seem to have any order to it doesn’t help either. If this were 20 diseases instead of eight, the chart would be doomed!
Kudos for picking appropriate colors though. It helps that they used a natural mapping (pink <–> breast cancer; red <–> AIDS) that might help a bit.
The more worrying issue is that it makes a classic distortion mistake; look at the right side and rapidly answer the question, using just the images, not the text: “How many more deaths are there due to the purple disease than the blue disease?”
Using the image as a guide, your answer is likely to be in the range 10 to 20 times as man, because the ratio of the areas is about that amount. When you look at the text, though, it’s actually only about four times. The numbers are not encoding the area, which is what we see, but they are encoding the radius (or diameter) which we do not immediately perceive.
The result is a sensationalist chart. It takes a real difference, but sensationalizes it by exaggerating the difference dramatically. If you want to use circles, map the variable of interest to AREA, not RADIUS. It fits our perceptions much more truthfully. It’s not actually perfect; we tend to see small circles as larger than they really are; but it’s much, much better).
So, here’s a reworking:
I tried to keep close to the original color mappings, as they are pretty good, but have used width to encode the variable of interest, keeping the height of the rectangle fixed. I also labeled the items on both sides so we can see much more easily that heart disease kills about 4x as many people as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
I also added some links between the two disease rankings to help visually link the two and aid navigation. The result is, I believe, not only more truthful, but easier to use. In short, it works.